Managing Corporate Name Infringement in Vietnam

Posted by Reading Time: 5 minutes

Fake BrandsBy: Dezan Shira & Associates 
Editor: Maxfield Brown

In the midst of attracting record investment from all corners of the globe, Vietnam has a nasty secret – intellectual property (IP). Not only does the nation rank 88th out of 140 economies in terms of IP protection, but policy instability is increasingly cited by investors as a concerning aspect of doing business within the country.

For manufacturing companies flocking to Vietnam for its low costs and close proximity to China, IP may seem an issue of little concern. Traditionally manufacturing operations have been devoid of high value add trade secrets and thus faced little exposure to theft. While the nature of production is likely to change as Vietnam solidifies it position in electronics manufacturing, a more salient IP risk in the near to medium term regards the safeguarding of brand reputation.

MNCs and well regarded SME brands choosing to invest in Vietnam are often faced with competitors branding themselves under the same or similar names. Not only can this cut into profits, but it also hurts the reputation of emerging brands in the event that competitors manufacture similar goods at a lower quality.

For all companies involved in manufacturing in Vietnam, understanding intellectual property laws is a significant asset in preventing infringement within the country. Key legislation in this regard includes:

  • Decree No. 99/2013/ND-CP on the sanctioning of infringements in the field of industrial property
  • Decree No. 78/2015/ND-CP on enterprise registration

As mentioned, a key component of Vietnam’s problems with IP protection center on its emergent regulatory environment. With new laws and guidance being crafted by the authorities on an annual basis, companies can often be unaware of changes to procedures and thus are unable to counter challenges in an effective manner. Issued by the Ministries of Science and Technology, and Investment and Planning on April 5th, 2016, Joint Circular 05/2016/TTLT-BKHCN-BKHDT provides the most up to date guidance on the process that investors should expect with regard to name infringement claims.

Professional Service_CB icons_2015RELATED: Dezan Shira & Associates’ Corporate Establishment Services
Procedures for Resolving Name Infringement Disputes

Following the submission of infringement allegations pursuant to guidelines issues under Decree No.78/2015, Vietnamese authorities will issue a decision on the validity of these claims. Should the decision indicate that infringement has occurred, the process outlined below will be implemented to resolve the infringement: 

Step 1 –  Following a decision from authorities indicating that a violation of name infringement has occurred, a period of 30 days is provided for the parties in question to come to a private settlement. This settlement must be reached in compliance with guidelines established under article 27 of Decree No.99/2013/ND-CP. If a settlement is reached, the case is dropped by governmental authorities.

Step 2 – If 30 days pass and a private settlement is not reached, companies may request the business registration office take action against the party the infringing party. After 10 days, the business registration office is required to have sent a notice to the infringing company requiring it to change its name.

Step 3 – From the date that the infringing company receives the notice to change its name, it has 2 months to complete the relevant legal procedures for a name change. When this process has been completed, holders of industrial property rights will be notified in 5 working days.

Related-Reading-Icon-Asean Link Related: LG to Invest 1.5 Billion in Vietnamese Electronics Production
Dealing with Non-Compliance

At times, despite actions taken by governmental authorities, those found to be infringing will fail to comply. Should this occur, more severe penalties can be sought. These penalties will begin with fines and end in business license revocation. The following steps are utilized when rolling out penalties associated with non-compliance:

Step 1 – Administrative penalties are issued and the infringing company will have 60 days to comply with these penalties and complete required procedures pursuant to changing its name.

Step 2 – Following the end of the 60 day compliance period, if the infringing party still has yet to comply, the authorities will within 15 days send a request to the company for an explanation regarding their non-compliance.

Step 3 – The infringing party will then have 10 days reply to the request for an explanation with reasoning, documents and other materials outlining their rationale for non-compliance. If no response is sent after 6 months, the business registration office will revoke the infringing party’s business registration certificate.

Optimizing Protection

In total, the process for successfully mitigating name infringement risks can take up to a year to complete. To ensure that action is taken at the earliest possible point, companies should familiarize themselves with procedures outlined above as well as related legislation. If questions arise during this process, it is highly recommended that companies seek the council of governmental officials or a professional investment services firm. 


About
 Us

Asia Briefing Ltd. is a subsidiary of Dezan Shira & Associates. Dezan Shira is a specialist foreign direct investment practice, providing corporate establishment, business advisory, tax advisory and compliance, accounting, payroll, due diligence and financial review services to multinationals investing in China, Hong Kong, India, Vietnam, Singapore and the rest of ASEAN. For further information, please email vietnam@dezshira.com or visit www.dezshira.com.

Stay up to date with the latest business and investment trends in Asia by subscribing to our complimentary update service featuring news, commentary and regulatory insight.

Related Reading Icon-VB

Annual Audit and Compliance in Vietnam 2016
In this issue of Vietnam Briefing, we address pressing changes to audit procedures in 2016, and provide guidance on how to ensure that compliance tasks are completed in an efficient and effective manner. We highlight the continued convergence of VAS with IFRS, discuss the emergence of e-filing, and provide step-by-step instructions on audit and compliance procedures for Foreign Owned Enterprises (FOEs) as well as Representative Offices (ROs).

VB_2015_Navigating_the_Vietnam_Supply_Chain_ImageNavigating the Vietnam Supply Chain
In this edition of Vietnam Briefing, we discuss the advantages of the Vietnamese market over its regional competition and highlight where and how to implement successful investment projects. We examine tariff reduction schedules within the ACFTA and TPP, highlight considerations with regard to rules of origin, and outline the benefits of investing in Vietnam’s growing economic zones. Finally, we provide expert insight into the issues surrounding the creation of 100 percent Foreign Owned Enterprise in Vietnam.

Tax, Accounting and Audit in Vietnam 2016 (2nd Edition)
This edition of Tax, Accounting, and Audit in Vietnam, updated for 2016, offers a comprehensive overview of the major taxes foreign investors are likely to encounter when establishing or operating a business in Vietnam, as well as other tax-relevant obligations. This concise, detailed, yet pragmatic guide is ideal for CFOs, compliance officers and heads of accounting who must navigate Vietnam’s complex tax and accounting landscape in order to effectively manage and strategically plan their Vietnam operations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *