Yarn Forward’s Effect on the Trans-Pacific Partnership and Vietnam

Posted by Reading Time: 6 minutes

By Edward Barbour-Lacey

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a United States led trade agreement involving twelve countries, is currently under negotiation. A key part of the proposed format of the TPP is a rule known as “yarn forward”. In essence, “yarn forward” would require that only fabric produced from yarn made by a TPP country would qualify for the trade agreement’s duty-free status. The rule is intended to ensure that the trade benefits of the TPP only apply to signatory countries rather than outside players such as China. However, the rule also has significant effects on signatory countries, such as Vietnam.

Upon completion, the TPP trade area would comprise a region with US$28 trillion in economic output, making up around 39 percent of the world’s total output.  If the TPP is successfully implemented, tariffs will be removed on almost US$2 trillion in goods and services exchanged between the signatory countries. Thus, Vietnam has much to gain from the implementation of the trade agreement, including drastically reduced tariffs in some of the world’s largest markets.

Vietnam’s reaction

Yarn forward could have serious effects for countries like Vietnam. The country is currently a key global garment manufacturing location, however, its factories often use Chinese-made fabrics in their products, and China is not a part of the TPP. In fact, around eighty-five percent of Vietnamese textile and garment companies have outsourcing contracts with foreign partners. What all this means is that, if Vietnam wants to be eligible for TPP benefits such as lower tariffs in the US, it will have to develop its own local fabric industry or constrain itself to only importing fabric from another TPP country.

Vietnam is currently working to have the “yarn forward” rule removed, or its implementation delayed, from the TPP. A number of other countries have also pledged their support to Vietnam. However, other actions that Vietnam has taken show that it may be ready to acquiesce to yarn forward, and the country has so far expressed fairly consistent support for the trade agreement, since it will allow many of its other products market access to some of the world’s biggest economies. Therefore, it seems that the rule will not be a fatal roadblock to the TPP’s finalization. The US Trade Representative (USTR) has also stated that the US will not pull back from its demand for yarn forward.

Professional Service_CB icons_2015RELATED: Dezan Shira & Associates’ Pre-Investment and Entry Strategy Advisory

In a sign that the country has felt which way the wind is blowing, a number of Vietnamese companies are already starting up, or expanding, their own fiber manufacturing operations in order to not be left behind when the TPP is finally implemented. Key companies include the Century Synthetic Fiber Corporation (CSFC), Thanh Cong Joint Stock Co (TCM), and the Vietnam Textile and Garment Corporation (Vinatex).

Additionally, in a further bid to enhance the competitiveness of the country’s fiber manufacturing industry, Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and Trade has proposed levying a two percent import tax on polyester staple fiber (PSF). Currently PSF imports are not subject to tax.

The U.S. argument for yarn forward

While yarn forward may have some deleterious impacts upon Vietnam, US textile makers are keen for the rule to be implemented. This is because they believe that the rule will help to constrain China and Vietnam’s entrance into the US market. In turn, US textile makers also believe that the rule will make Vietnam more attractive to American textile industry investment.

This is not the first time that a “yarn forward” principle has been pushed by the United States. During the North American Free Trade Agreement negotiations in 1993, the rule was used as a way to protect US markets. It was also used in the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), which stated that the yarn, fabric, sewing thread, and the final garment itself must be made either in the United States or one of the six Caribbean or Central American countries party to the agreement. Manufacturers have found the yarn forward rule to be a strong tool in ensuring their competitiveness on the world market.

Related Link IconRELATED: Vietnam-U.S. Relationship Shows Continued Signs of Improvement, TPP Progressing

The TPP has garnered strong support from many US manufacturers. In a clear sign of this support, the National Council of Textile Organizations is pushing Congress to allow the President to use fast track authority to approve the trade agreement. When this authority is given, Congress is restricted to a simple yes/no vote on the TPP and is not able to amend specific sections of the agreement. If fast track is granted, trade negotiations could be finished in a matter of months.

“Short supply” rule could mollify Vietnam

In their fight against yarn forward, countries like Vietnam have joined forces with retailors such as Walmart and Target in order to push for more flexibility in the rule. The USTR appears to be somewhat receptive to these voices and, in its most recent “summary of objectives”, it has included a “short supply” rule. This rule would allow raw materials “not commercially available in the United States or other TPP countries to be sourced from non-TPP countries and used in the production of apparel in the TPP region without losing duty preference.”

While the USTR says this flexibility will be limited, others have criticized the rule as once again opening the door to China. If Chinese goods are allowed into Vietnam and exported to the US, then China will be accruing the benefits of the TPP without having to give up anything itself. This problem can be seen in the rules of origin related to other goods, for example some have rules stating that up to 65 percent of the product can be manufactured outside of the country, but the product can still be deemed as having been made within that country. In reaction to this criticism, the USTR has strongly expressed its belief that the short supply rule will not allow countries to be able to launder their products through TPP nations.

It would seem that only time can tell what the true effects of the TPP will be, but businesses would be wise to plan for all eventualities and ensure they are prepared to take advantage of such rules as yarn forward.


Asia Briefing Ltd. is a subsidiary of Dezan Shira & Associates. Dezan Shira is a specialist foreign direct investment practice, providing corporate establishment, business advisory, tax advisory and compliance, accounting, payroll, due diligence and financial review services to multinationals investing in China, Hong Kong, India, Vietnam, Singapore and the rest of ASEAN. For further information, please email vietnam@dezshira.com or visit www.dezshira.com.

Stay up to date with the latest business and investment trends in Asia by subscribing to our complimentary update service featuring news, commentary and regulatory insight.

Related Reading Icon-VB

Import and Export: A Guide to Trade in Vietnam
In this issue of Vietnam Briefing Magazine, we provide you with a clear understanding of the current business trends related to trade in Vietnam, as well as explaining how to set up your trading business in the country. We also attempt to give perspective on what will be Vietnam’s place in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in 2015, and look at some of the country’s key import and export regulations.

Using Vietnam’s Free Trade & Double Tax Agreements
In this issue of Vietnam Briefing we explore how Vietnam’s Free Trade Agreements – and especially those via its membership in ASEAN – will affect foreign investment into Vietnam. We also go a step further and examine the specific, bilateral Double Tax Agreements that Vietnam has enacted, and how these can be further used to minimize profits and withholding taxes that would otherwise be levied upon foreign investors.

Developing Your Sourcing Strategy for Vietnam In this issue of Vietnam Briefing Magazine, we outline the various sourcing models available for foreign investors – representative offices, service companies and trading companies – and discuss how to decide which structure best suits the sourcing needs of your business.