Explainer: Countervailing and Antidumping Duties in Vietnam

As the patchwork of multilateral free trade agreements governing international trade grows, so too does the use of non-tariff barriers like antidumping and countervailing duties. Here’s what foreign firms in Vietnam need to know and why doing a periodic supply chain audit is becoming increasingly business-critical.

Vietnam has signed up to a total of 15 free trade agreements with two more expected to be signed in the next year or so. These trade agreements have significantly lowered tariffs for businesses importing goods and services into Vietnam and companies in Vietnam exporting to other parts of the world.

But despite the prosperity free trade brings, there can often be negative consequences with foreign companies taking advantage of improved trade conditions to dump surplus goods on foreign markets.

Furthermore, governments often look to protect domestic industries impacted by reduced tariffs by providing subsidies. This can give those industries an unfair advantage in their export markets.

It is this reality that has given rise to antidumping duties (ADDs) and countervailing duties (CVDs). These two non-tariff barriers have become an important part of international trade and continue to grow in prominence.

Understanding how these mechanisms work in the Vietnamese context can be crucial when diversifying supply chains to include the rapidly growing Southeast Asian nation. It can also be helpful when establishing regional cross-border supply chains.

Vietnam’s application of ADD/CVDs

In Vietnam, ADDs and CVDs are handled by the Trade Remedies Authority of Vietnam, which reports to the Ministry of Industry and Trade.

There are currently 25 ADDs being applied to goods exported to Vietnam as well as one CVD. These are all targeted at exports from countries in Asia except for two ADDs that apply to some yarn products and certain sorbitol based products from India.

Notably, these measures are not only applied to alleged dumping nations but also third countries allegedly being used to circumvent Vietnam’s trade remedies.

Thailand, for example, is currently subjected to ADDs and CVDs on sugar products (See Decision No.1578/QD-BCT).

This was extended in August of last year (See Decision No. 1514/QD-BCT), by the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MoIT), to include sugar imported from Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, and Myanmar. These five countries, MoIT found, were being used as third parties by Thai producers to circumvent trade remedies applied to Thai sugar.

This practice, of applying ADDs and CVDs to third countries is not unique to Vietnam either. On the contrary, Vietnam itself has been subjected to ADDs and CVDs as a third-party country used to circumvent trade remedies in other jurisdictions on multiple occasions.

Global trade dynamics: Vietnam’s role in circumventing trade restrictions targeting China

The ongoing so-called ‘trade war’ between China and the United States is fuelling a shift into Vietnam but that doesn’t always necessarily mean building manufacturing plants and factories.

Chinese manufacturers are increasingly looking at Vietnam as an access point to foreign markets and a way to circumvent trade restrictions on imports from China.

Solar panels made in China, for example, are subjected to antidumping duties in the US after it was determined that they were being sold below cost. These tariffs were applied in 2012 and subsequently saw Chinese manufacturers shift production to Taiwan. US tariffs were then extended to include Taiwan too.

This has now escalated further to include several companies in a number of Southeast Asian nations – last year, a US Department of Commerce investigation found that solar panels made by four companies exporting to the US from Malaysia, Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam were mostly made in China.

These four Southeast Asia nations, it found, were being used to circumvent ADDs and CVDs on the aforementioned solar panels. But this was just a preliminary hearing and there is still time for those companies to appeal. If the outcome is upheld, however, it could see ADDs/CVDs applied to imports from these countries to the tune of US$5 billion.

Increased use of ADDs and CVDs worldwide

The use of ADDs and CVDs has grown substantially in recent years as free trade agreements have proliferated.

From 2001 to 2010, a total of 483 antidumping measures went into force. The following decade, from 2011 to 2020, that number ballooned to 1323. The bulk of those measures were initiated by the United States and China was the most popular target, according to World Trade Organisation data.

Also of note is a huge spike in 2021. Whereas in 2020 just 106 new measures were enacted, the following year that number was 285.

There has also been a big uptick in countervailing measures. From 2001 to 2010, just 41 countervailing duties were in force. From 2011 to 2020, however, that number climbed to 151. There was also a huge spike in CVDs in 2021 with 38 measures put into place compared to just 21 a year earlier.

There is a point of note here..

Though on an upward trajectory overall, the number of new ADDs and CVDs dropped in 2020 versus 2019. This could be because of the pandemic slowing production and export volumes. By the same token, the spike in 2021 could be because of economies bouncing back. It could also be that the economic situation was volatile, and companies may have felt the need to take drastic measures, such as dumping excess stock, in order to stay afloat.

That said, it’s difficult to draw any definitive conclusions. Suffice to say, there are more ADD and CVD measures in place now than ever before.

Importance of supply chain audits

All of this is to say that though free trade agreements are opening up markets and creating avenues for diversified supply chains, through ADDs and CVDs – nation states are empowered to protect domestic enterprises.

With this in mind, it is important to note that Southeast Asia’s supply chains are becoming increasingly intertwined with the origin points of parts and materials sometimes opaque. Foreign firms need to do their due diligence on the companies they engage with across their supply chains to avoid costly ADD/CVD measures.

Companies considering diversifying their supply chains, particularly out of China, need to be mindful of this new paradigm.

Ensuring that compliance controls are in place in the case of local partners, clear knowledge of the corporate affiliations of partners, and an understanding of where raw materials and key inputs are sourced, are necessary to avoid being on the wrong side of an antidumping investigation.

Foreign firms should also be mindful that the ADD/CVD mechanism may be an option in case their Vietnam operations are impacted by unfair trade practices.

That said, ADDs and CVDs are just one among many potential complications that need to be considered when establishing cross-border supply chains. In this light, for expert advice on navigating potential trade barriers and legal pitfalls, contact the experts at Dezan Shira and Associates.

Appendix: Tables

About this data

• This data only includes measures reported to the World Trade Organisation.
• Data herein applies to antidumping and countervailing measures in force as of January 1, 2020.
• Data current as of March 1, 2023.

Vietnam’s countervailing measures

Countervailing measures against Vietnam

Source: Countervailing measures – Trade Remedies Data Portal

Vietnam’s anti-dumping measures

Anti-dumping measures against Vietnamese imports

Source: Antidumping measures – Trade Remedies Data Portal

• Previous Article Startup Investment in Vietnam 2023 – Ein Schnellratgeber
• Next Article Vietnam News in Brief: Weekly Roundup March 3